Kim Kardashian and Taylor Swift had an exhausting day on the internet this Monday. In the immediate aftermath of Kardashian releasing video footage confirming that Swift did, in fact, have a conversation with Kanye West about her name drop in his song “Famous,” public opinion has taken a dramatic turn against Swift.
There were memes and think pieces galore, but on top of all that, people flooded Swift’s Instagram response with comments to let her know how they really felt. They accused her of being a liar, they called out her tendency to always play victim who needed to be coddled when things don’t work out in her favor. Several simply left snake emojis.
But go look at the comments right now. Of course, you can’t scroll through the 292,000 (and counting) comments, but even thumbing through the first hundred, you may notice something. No one has a negative thing to say.
According to multiple outlets, Instagram users are reporting that the app is actively monitoring her post, deleting comments that contain rat or snake emojis or any sort of “hate speech.” If you try to leave a comment with any snake emojis, good luck. You’ll likely run into a pop-up from Instagram warning you that they “restrict certain content and actions to protect our community.”
Technically, they’re allowed to do that. Instagram’s Community Guidelines allow them to remove “content that contains credible threats or hate speech, content that targets private individuals to degrade or shame them, personal information meant to blackmail or harass someone, and repeated unwanted messages.”
But it seems as if Swift is getting special attention. When StyleCaster asked, a spokesperson simply said, “We’re always looking for better ways to help people prevent spammy or inappropriate comments on Instagram.”
Ignore the weird implications of selective censorship for a minute. That’s another issue. Because while Instagram was busy deleting emojis, “Ghostbusters” star Leslie Jones was spending her Monday retweeting racist comments she’s been receiving in wake of the movie’s release.
Twitter has taken no action against accounts hurling racial slurs and derogatory comments in her direction. Let that sink in.
Here’s the thing: being a woman on the internet sucks sometimes. Like, a lot. Women are harassed constantly and viciously, often for no reason other than the fact that they’re female. Very few of us are immune; a recent study showed that nearly 76 percent of women under 30 online experience some form of abuse or harassment.
I’m sure a fair amount of comments on Swift’s post were spammy or inappropriate or derogatory. I’m sure a fair amount of comments were pieces of hate speech that deserved to be deleted. But how do we decide when a simple emoji counts as hate speech? How do we decide where the line is drawn between legitimate criticism and harassment?
How did we decide that celebrities — but only a select few — are above this? Instagram’s community guidelines clearly state that they protect “private individuals.” Swift is a public figure. Negative comments are what she signed up for when she signed up for fame. This isn’t an issue of protecting someone from pure hate speech. It’s an issue of coddling and protecting a privileged white celebrity — who is a grown woman — from any vague form of negative sentiment.
Why is Instagram stepping into this particular situation, when they did nothing for the slew of bee and lemon emojis against not only Rachel Roy, but her 16-year-old daughter, too, after “Lemonade” dropped? What about all the trolls on Kesha’s account? What about the attacks (full of snake emojis, no less) on Kardashian? What about real, unfamous women who experience harassment on a daily basis? If this is the kind of content Instagram wants to censor, it needs to censor it for everyone — not just a few.
When Leslie Jones can be called every racial slur in the book and has to sit back and take it, but Taylor Swift’s feelings are hurt by snake emojis, so they are removed, that’s called white privilege. There is really no other way to describe it.
What is happening on Swift’s social media right now — the selective action of intervening — is real time evidence of how Swift represents a dangerous form of white woman. As journalist Damon Young says, we all know a woman like Swift. She twists situations to become the victim, gets preferential treatment, especially when pitted against people of color. Maybe that’s why we are so actively interested in this situation.
It’s not a funny thing to watch anymore. Not in this time of such elevated tension. Not in this time when white cops are shooting black men on camera and getting away with it. Certainly not in a time where your silence on the subject speaks volumes. No, the white female victim game that Taylor Swift plays isn’t funny anymore, and it has passed the point of being tired and veered into the dangerous territory. She has millions of little girls looking up to her, and her actions leave lasting impressions. They have consequences.
Girls need protecting sometimes, yes, and the internet needs to be better about the harassment we face on a daily basis. But young girls also need to know that not everyone gets special treatment, particularly if they’re not white. Not everyone gets to behave badly without being held accountable. They need to learn that crying foul any time they feel wronged isn’t an automatic fix — that, when someone says something critical of them, the best response is to work hard, succeed, and prove them wrong, not to argue about character assassination.
Above all else, young girls need to learn how to be the heroines of their lives, not the victims. Unfortunately, that’s not the example Swift is portraying today.
Photo credit: Getty Images